Fork me on GitHub

Output

Publicaties

 

auteurs titel bron  status | jaar
Lesterhuis, M.
Verhavert, S.
Coertjens, L.
De Maeyer, S.
Donche, V.
Comparative Judgement as a promising alternative to score competences Boekhoofdstuk in ‘Innovative Practices for Higher Education Assessment and Measurement’ 2017
van Daal, T.
Lesterhuis, M.
Coertjens, L.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Examining the validity of Comparative Judgement to assess academic writing: using judges’ expertise and building rank-orders on a shared consensus Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2016
Van Gasse, R.
Vanlommel, K.
Vanhoof, J.
Van Petegem, P.
Teacher collaboration on the use of pupil learning outcome data : a rich environment for professional learning? Teaching and Teacher Education 2016
Lesterhuis, M.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Van Daal, T.
Van Gasse, R.
Coertjens, L.
Verhavert, S.
Mortier, A.
Coenen, T.
Vlerick, P.
Vanhoof, J.
Van Petegem, P.
Competenties kwaliteitsvol beoordelen : brengt een comparatieve aanpak soelaas? Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs 2015
Mortier, A.
Lesterhuis, M.
Vlerick, P.
De Maeyer, S.
Comparative judgment within online assessment: exploring students feedback reactions Communications in Computer and Information Science 2015
Coenen et al An information system design theory for the comparative judgement of competences http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejis/index.html Conditionally accepted
Coenen, T.
Robijt, S.
Towards FALL: a Framework for Agile Living Lab projects The Living Lab Handbook“ (Springer) Accepted
Coertjens, L.
De Maeyer, S.
Verhavert, S.
Goossens, M.
Lesterhuis, M.
Comparative judgement or rubrics: Examining the reliability-efficiency trade-off Pedagogische Studiën in progress
Mortier, A.
Lesterhuis, M.
Comparative Judgement-based feedback versus common practice: similarities and differences in progress
Van Gasse, R.
Goossens, M.
Mortier, A.
Vanhoof, J.
Van Petegem, P.
Vlerick, P.
De Maeyer, S.
Feedback opportunities of Comparative Judgement: An overview of possible features and acceptance at different user levels.  Springer  aanvaard
Van Gasse, R.
Vanlommel, K.
Vanhoof, J.
Van Petegem, P
The central role of collaboration in teachers’ use of learning outcomes School Effectiveness and School Improvement under revision
Van Gasse, R.
Vanlommel, K.
Vanhoof, J.
Van Petegem, P.
Individual, co-operative and collaborative information use. A conceptual and empirical exploration British Educational Research Journal under revision
Verhavert, S.
De Maeyer, S.
Donche, V.
Coertjens, L.
Scale Separation Reliability in Comparative Judgement: What does it mean? Applied Psychological Measurement under revision
Verhavert, S.
Bouwer, R.
De Maeyer, S.
Donche, V.
When is a Comparative Judgement assessment reliable [working title] Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice in preparation

Presentaties & posters

 

auteurs titel bijdrage conferentie periode & plaats
Verhavert, S.
De Maeyer S.
Donche V.
The method of Comparative Judgement for assessment and research AEA Februari 2017, Wenen
Verhavert, S.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Coertjens, L.
A review study to identify adaptive algorithms for increasing the efficiency of Comparative Judgment AEA November 2016, Limassol
Verhavert, S.
De Maeyer, S.
Donche, V.
Coertjens, L.
Comparative Judgement and Scale Separation Reliability; yes, but what does it mean AEA November 2016, Limassol
van Daal, T
Lesterhuis, M.
Coertjens, L.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Using comparative judgement for the assessment of academic writing: an examination of its validity AEA November 2016, Limassol
Lesterhuis, M.
Vermeiren, K.
De Maeyer, S.
Coertjens, L.
Goossens, M.
Verhavert, S.
Does comparative judgement result in valid scores/ rank orders? Evidence from CJ research on argumentative writing and mathematical problem solving Competence Conference 2016 November 2016, Wageningen
Lesterhuis, M.
Michels, N.
Coertjens, L.
De Winter, B.
De Maeyer, S.
Paarsgewijze vergelijking als alternatief voor scoren met rubrieken: hoe scoren we zelfreflecties valide, betrouwbaar en efficiënt? NVMO November, 2016 Egmond aan Zee
Van Gasse, R.
Goossens, M.
Mortier, A.
Feedback opportunities of Comparative Judgement: An overview of possible features and acceptance at different user levels. TEA Oktober 2016, Tallinn
Hamer, R.
Coertjens, L. (chairs)
Practical issues with (A)CJ (contributions from The Netherlands, Cyprus & Belgium) EARLI SIG 1 Augustus 2016, München
Lesterhuis, M.
Coertjens, L.
Daal, T.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Comparative Judgement and writing assessment: Do comparison characteristics guide assessors’ attention? EARLI SIG 1 Augustus, 2016, München
Verhavert, S.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Coertjens, L.
A review study to identify adaptive algorithms for increasing the efficiency of Comparative Judgment IMPS Juni 2016, Asheville
Mortier, A.
Lesterhuis, M.
Vlerick, P.
De Maeyer, S.
Comparative judgment-based feedback versus the traditional approach: similarities and differences AHE Juni 2016, Manchester
Coertjens, L.
van Daal, T.
Lesterhuis, M.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Examining the Validity of Assessment of Students’ Academic Writing using Comparative Judgement AERA April 2016, Washington
Lesterhuis, M.
Mortier, A.
Coertjens, L.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Feedback op schrijven: Wat heeft de comparatieve methode te bieden? ORD Mei 2016, Rotterdam
Coertjens, L.
Verhavert, S.
Lesterhuis, M.
Goossens, M.
De Maeyer, S.
Is comparative
judgement more efficient? An explorative study into the reliability-efficiency trade-off when using
rubrics or comparative judgement
AEA November 2015, Glasgow
Verhavert, S.
Coertjens, L.
De Maeyer, S.
Donche, V.
Construction of a benchmark categorization algorithm for Comparative Judgement AEA November 2015, Glasgow
Coertjens, L.
van Daal, T.
Lesterhuis, M.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Comparative judgement versus Rubrics: Which one is more valid, reliable and efficient? EARLI Augustus 2015, Limassol
Mortier, A.
Lesterhuis, M.
Vlerick, P.
De Maeyer, S.
Comparative judgment within online assessment SURF SIG (Digitaal) toetsen en leren integreren Oktober 2015, Utrecht
Mortier, A.
Lesterhuis, M.
Vlerick, P.
De Maeyer, S.
Comparative judgment within online assessment: exploring students feedback reactions CAA Juni 2015, Zeist
Coertjens,
van Daal, T.
Lesterhuis, M.
Donche, V.
De Maeyer, S.
Valid and reliable assessment of students’ academic writing using Comparative judgement AHE Juni 2015, Birmingham
Coenen, T Opening the prototyping black box in living labs (invited speaker) ISPIM innovation conference 2015, Budapest
Coenen, T The wearable Living Lab: how wearables could support Living Lab projects Open Living Lab days 2015, Istanbul
Coertjens L.
van Daal T.
Lesterhuis M.
De Maeyer S.
Donche V.
Van Gasse R.
Van Petegem P.
Vanhoof J.
Mortier A.
Vlerick P.
Coenen T.
Ballon P.
Using Adaptive Comparative Judgement to assess competences AEA November 2014, Tallinn